Platonic Paradox :: essays research papers

To research Platos problem in the Meno, we can first consult the definition of what platonism is. Websters regulates platonism as "actual things are copies of transcendent ideas and that these ideas are the objects of aline knowledge apprehended by reminiscence." For this essay, we will assume that trancendency is- "that which is beyond comprehension", and reminiscence as "past experience". The Meno is a dialogue between Socrates, a educatee and Meno, who eventually became an explorer. For this essay, however, we will assume that Meno is at the time of the dialogue, an upper-class citizen of number to better than average intelligence and superior stubbornness. The piece, according to the translation by G.M.A. Grube is thought to have taken place in approximately 402 B.C. in Athens, Greece. Late in the text, a third character, Anytus, a politician, who would eventually be an accuser of Socrates, joins in the dialogue. In the text, Meno in trying to defin e virtue by the way slips in to a paradox or contradictory statement, which Socrates immediately refutes. It is the subroutine of this paper to recognize the paradox, examine how Socrates disproves the paradox through line of reasoning and evidence. Socrates too brings up a key distinction between true persuasion and knowledge, relating to the paradox, which will too be examined. Socrates then gives basis for more argumentation regarding the paradox, and why he does this will also be examined. The initial argument takes place when Socrates challenges Meno to define virtue. Meno does non realize here what he has started. Meno has in front inquired whether virtue is a quality that can be taught or if it is a natural trait, that men are born with. Socrates, in method true to form, twists the question and re-poses it to Meno to see if Meno can answer it all on his own. Meno lists what he thinks are virtuous qualities, and is content at that simple definition. Socrates then says & quotI seem to be in luck, Meno, while I am sounding for one virtue, I have found you to have a only swarm of them."Menos frustration begins to set in. He tries theatrical metaphor to define virtue, as well as relating to physical philosophy and philosophers such as Empedocles.Meno at this point gives up and hands the philosophy to Socrates. Socrates presents Meno with a paradox"....He cannot search for what (a debater) knows- since he knows it, there is no need to search- nor for what he does not know, for he does not know what to look for.